The Uses and Abuses of
History
Published: The
Economist; economist.com http://www.library.boun.edu.tr/en/veritabanlari.php#E
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18975942.htm
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18975942.htm
Level of
Difficulty:****
2.
Why
was the Irish potato famine and the treatment of the Irish by The English at
the time made a part of the curriculum of New York schools?
3.
The
author states that “the carcass of plague- ridden horse catapulted over the
city walls” would not have been out of place in many a Bosnian town. Why does
he say this?
4.
Why
is the fact that “June the 28th can puff out more chests in Serbia
as no other date” a little surprising?
5.
State
one example from the text proving that an exaggerated sense of history may be a
little hard to understand.
6.
Why
did Begin agree to give back Sinai but not the West Bank?
7.
Britain
is provided as an example of a nation that…………………………………………………………………
8.
Why
does the writer criticize The Serbs?
9.
What
makes history open to abuse acc. to the text?
10.
The
writer states various views concerning history in paragraph 15. Why are they
unrealistic?
11.
Germany
is contrasted with Austria, Japan, Italy and France in that………………………………………
12.
A.
China is an example of a state
which………………………………………………………………..................
B. What is the reason for the above attitude of The Chinese officials?
13.
What
is meant by the phrase “Many Russians fell hungrily on the facts”? What,
exactly did The Russians hope to achieve?
14.
Ukraine
is provided as an example of a country that…………………………………………………………..
15.
After
reading on until the end of paragraph 29, could you state briefly why The Canadian
prime minister and Massimo D’Azeglio lamented the lack of history?
16.
Why
would Mohammed Ali Jinnah, Pakistan’s founding father be surprised acc. to the
text?
17.
What
does the writer praise Ernesto Zedillo for?
18.
Why
is it unfortunate that Britain is obsessed with the Second World War?
19.
Read
from paragraph 26 to the end of paragraph 40 and find proof to support the
writer’s – Trevor Ropper – claim that “the whole concept of a distinct Highland
culture and tradition is a retrospective invention. Consider the following: the
bagpipe, the kilt, clan tartans and Whiskey.
NATIONS AND THEIR PAST / KEY
This brilliant essay on the disadvantages of
too strong a sense of history was published in The Economist on December 21st,
1996. Due to its subject matter, it is pretty much timeless. The text really
comes alive with a teacher with a good knowledge of history who can fill in the
gaps so I do suggest homework for the teachers. The text has the potential for
some wonderful discussions. Therefore, I would suggest covering the vocabulary
while examining the text in sections and answering the questions. Too much
emphasis on vocabulary in the form of extended vocabulary exercises would take
the joy out of reading and kill any enthusiasm students may feel for the
subject matter. Again you are going to have to locate the text: economist.com.
- It is possible to have too much of a sense
of history
- There are votes to be won.
- It had medieval ferocity or the war in
Bosnia was, after all, a strangely primitive affair.
- Because the entire Serb nation was cast
into 500 years of Muslim subjugation.
- The tearing down of The Babri Mosque in
the town of Ayodhya.
- The West Bank holds Biblical significance.
- They have the stuff and get stuck into it.
- For dwelling on their defeats and
wallowing in self pity.
- History is a matter of interpretation as
well as evidence; of judgment as well as knowledge.
- It is too easy to use history for
disreputable purposes.
- Germany has been self critical whereas the
others have not (or something similar).
- Wrote its own version of history. /
Busying giddy minds with the humiliations of history to show that the
world is still out to get them and thus justify The Communist Party’s hold
on power.
- What had really happened…. / They wanted
to get at the truth.
- Acquired history through self delusion.
- It is one of those things that every young
country has to have in order to give its people a national identity.
- Because the history of Pakistan has been
rewritten from an Islamic point of view.
- For revising textbooks to reveal the uglier
aspects of his nation’s history.
- Because it has given rise to a national
myth that encourages some Britons to believe that they alone have a
morally respectable history.
- The bagpipe was developed after the 1707
act of union with Britain; the kilt was invented by an English Quaker by
the name of Thomas Rawlinson, clan tartans owe their existence to the
Allen brothers and claret was the national drink of Scotland.
No comments:
Post a Comment