bbc.
co.uk /news
Fatal
accidents and injuries cause a lot of people’s death every day. But there is
something worse than death: paralysis and incurable injuries. Is euthanasia
acceptable in situations such as this? The issue became topical once again
following the case of Vincent Humbert.
Vincent
Humbert had a terrible accident that left him mute, blind and completely
paralyzed except for his right thumb three years ago and he described his
situation as a living death. He wanted to die because he was completely
dependent on others. He wrote a letter to president Chirac asking for the right
to die. Euthanasia is illegal in France so his request was turned down but his
mother gave him what he wanted by putting an overdose in his drip. Two days
later, the young man was dead. Before his death, he had written a book using
his right thumb which is called “I ask for the right to die”.
In
these conditions, Vincent Humbert must have felt desperate and wished to escape
from the eternal darkness and empty life. He couldn’t move or see; he could
only hear and think so it’s normal for to have wanted to die. The president
might have thought that he was right to want it but he had to obey the law. He
turned down Vincent’s request but he could have helped him to cross the border
to another country where euthanasia is legal. Forcing someone who doesn’t want
to live and has a logical reason for wanting to die to live is not fair.
Vincent’s mother, Marie Humbert, did the hardest thing for a mother: she killed
her son. By doing so she showed that she understood Vincent’s feelings and
respected his decisions.
Which
is better to allow someone in this situation to die or to force him to live? It
is very hard to say. One is as bad as the other. One thing is certain: Marie
Humbert shouldn’t be arrested but probably this is impossible according to the
law.
İREM GÜNGÖR / INT;
third week of
ReplyDeleteThanks for your content…Please visit my site!
Law Assignment Help UK
Complete Your Assignment From
ReplyDeletedo my nursing Assignment