“Modern day Milgram
experiment shows that people obeying commands feel less responsible for their
actions”
By: Joshua Barais
Published: The
Scientific American, February 19, 2016, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-nazi-s-defense-of-just-following-orders-plays-out-in-the-mind/
Level of difficulty: **
WATCH AND CONSIDER
·
Benjamin B. Ferencz, former
prosecutor for the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial
QUESTIONS
1.
Why did Eichmann use the “just following orders”
defense?
2.
What surprising conclusion did Milgram reach as
a result of his experiment?
3.
Acc. To new research, people don’t feel
responsible for inflicting harm on others if they are following orders because……………………..(Two
answers; find both)
4.
Acc. to a study published in Current Biology,
people inflicting pain on others as a result of a direct order saw their
attitude as involuntary/ impassive/irresponsible/ submissive / aggressive
5.
It can be concluded from the research at
University College London that people seem to lose their………………………when following
orders even if the outcome is unpleasant.
6.
Both Milgram’s and Perry’s experiments prove
that people feel ………………………….for what they do or say if …………………………………….
7.
What was the purpose of Haggard’s second
experiment?
8.
Did the experiment mentioned above support or
refute the initial hypothesis?
9.
Haggard’s findings justify/ validate / support/
disprove/challenge/ the Nuremberg defense.
WRITING TASK
Before you write, access the
following article and read it carefully: “Military
orders: to obey or not to obey” http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/militarylaw1/a/obeyingorders.htm.
When you have done so, write a paragraph or on essay on the following
topic: “To what extent can the Nuremberg
defense be justified?”
HOW NAZI’S DEFENSE OF
“JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS” PLAYS OUT IN THE MIND; KEY AND TEACHERS’ NOTES
This vitally
important yet straight forward text tackles a very important issue: the famous
Nuremberg defense. Many students of the current generation may be hearing about
it for the first time but it is important that they do. The writing task is an
argumentative essay.
1. To
shift the responsibility for the deaths of millions of Jews to his superiors
2. Any
human was capable of a heart of darkness ; OR, Ordinary folk would inflict harm
on another person after following orders from an authoritative figure
3. They
perceive a distance from outcomes; They feel disconnected from their actions
4. Submissive
5. Sense
of agency
6. Less
agency ; they choose for themselves
7. To
see whether the loss of agency could also be seen in the brain activity of
subjects
8. It
supported it
9. Challenge
(it means to question)
No comments:
Post a Comment