THE NEW YORK REVIEW
OF BOOKS
LEAD POISONING: THE
IGNORED SCANDAL
By: Helen Epstein
Published: March 21, 2013, The New York Review
of Books
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/mar/21/lead-poisoning-ignored-scandal/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=March+5+2013&utm_content=March+5+2013+CID_fa71c8cea1e7d401bc1235b6afca5706&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Lead%20Poisoning%20The%20Ignored%20Scandal . Alternatively, google the title and writer's name.
Level of Difficulty:****
Thanks are due to my friend and colleague Füsun
Savcı for providing this fascinating text.
BEFORE YOU READ
·
What
do you know about heavy metal poisoning? Which heavy metals are considered
toxic and in what different ways is the toxin ingested?
·
What
do you know about lead poisoning? What are the causes? What are the effects?
Now, google
lead poisoning, click videos and listen to and take notes from some of them.
Alternatively, do the same research on ted.com and watch, listen and take notes.
QUESTIONS
Section 1
- Why has lead poisoning due to lead paint
continued to be a problem despite the law passed in 1978?
- For what two reasons do we know that Max
was placed in danger when he moved into his Baltimore flat?
- What kinds of safeguards were provided for
the families that participated in the Baltimore study?
- Read the two paragraphs concerning the
lead removal methods. What ethical mistake was made during the removal
process?
- Read Denisa’s story carefully. Why was
Denisa’s mother advised to wash her front steps more carefully and to keep
Denisa from putting her hands in her mouth? Use your own words and your
common sense.
- How confident is the writer that Denisa’s
low IQ is related to lead poisoning? How do you know?
- Why was a study that endangered children
allowed to take place? Be brief.
- There are two social consequences of the
failure to tackle the problem of lead based paints. They are:
- What is the similarity between the
Baltimore study and the Tusgegee experiment? Use your own words.
- The Baltimore Toddler study was reviewed
and deemed ethical by the ethics committee at Johns Hopkins. What was the
probable reason why the committee reached such a conclusion?
- Which of the three ethical oversights was
considered the most serious? Why? Do you agree?
- The writer poses the following question in
the text: “Why did the scientists then proceed to test two ineffective
lead abatement methods?” What is the answer?
Section 2
- In what way is the case of the children at
the turn of the 20th century and certain factory workers similar?
Both groups suffered ………………………………………………………………………….
- The US market was awash with lead
containing products despite the international action against them for two
reasons. They were ………………………………………………………………………..
- The writer states that “gut renovating the
entire house solves the problem”. Why is such an extreme measure the only
option?
- How realistic is the Center for Disease Control’s
recommendation concerning acceptable levels of lead in the blood stream?
How do you know?
- What might be a possible reason why black
children were six times more likely to have elevated lead levels? Use your
head to state a possible logical answer.
- Efforts were made to sweep the emerging
problem of lead poisoning under the carpet by both the government and
industry. What specific measure was taken by the former?
- What overall conclusion can be drawn from
the three paragraphs detailing the measures taken by industry and the
government to hush up the issue of lead poisoning?
- Why was the plan to “remove lead from the
nation’s homes” shelved?
Section 3
- What is the misconception concerning
public health programs?
- What does “this lesson” refer to in the
phrase “Across the Channel, this lesson was not lost on the English…”?
- What two factors have been the driving
force behind some of the most urgent public health programs?
- The writer states that “They probably
weren’t right about everything but when it came to lead poisoning, they
probably were”. Why does he feel this way? You will need to tweak the text
and a word of warning: this is a hard question!
- The complete lack of interest in the issue
of lead poisoning to date may have led to……………..
- An alternative route Chisolm and Farley
could have taken is …………………………………………………..
WRITING TASK
Write a
reaction essay concerning what you have read. Use the suggestions below:
In your introduction, introduce the problem and the
article
In the first developmental paragraph, summarize the information. This is
a long text and you need to write a single paragraph so be very careful. The
points you should cover are as follows: the widespread use of lead based paints
despite the international ban, the public outcry and the action against it by
industry and government, continued neglect despite scientific data. You should
have no specific examples in your summary.
In the second developmental paragraph, state your own reaction to all you
have read.
In your conclusion discuss what can be done now.
LEAD POISONING: THE IGNORED SCANDAL KEY AND
TEACHER’S NOTES
This riveting and deeply distressing text
highlights a problem I personally was not aware of. I read the text with
absolute horror and disbelief as I am sure you will too. One point I must make
here concerns the number of questions: I prepare my material mainly for self
study and with that in mind, I like to cover the main points; plus this is a
long text. However, a few former students who have tried out this task assure
me that the length of the text and the number of questions are not a problem as
the text is so interesting.
- Because there was no adequate federal program
to deal with it.
- The landlord ( Polakoff) had been cited at
least ten times in the past for violating Baltimore’s lead paint
regulations and several former tenants would later sue him.
- Their homes would receive one of three
types of lead removal and their children would be given regular blood
tests ( to see if their lead levels rose or fell)
- No one told Max’s mother of the hot spots
( areas of lead paint that could shed dangerous dust)
- Possible answer: Because the researchers
knew of the blood test results and didn’t want to exacerbate the
situation.
- Quite confident; it is quite likely that
in her (Denisa’s) case lead poisoning was the cause.
- The government almost invariably chose to
protect the businesses that produced and marketed paint.
- Their nation (US) could have been more
intelligent; their nation could have been safer; the change from would to could is due to the way the question has
been asked.
- Possible answer: they were both unethical
or they both endangered the health of the subjects.
- Research like the toddler study was
necessary if affordable solutions to the problems of the poor were to be
found.
- The third because the researchers almost
certainly knew in advance that level 1 and level 2 abatement would not
protect the children from poisoning.
- These men could not effectively resist the
momentum of government indifference to the poor, pervasive racial
prejudice and careless decision making that influenced government policy
making throughout the lead poisoning crisis.
- Suffered / were exposed to lead poisoning
- The US was the largest producer in the
world, the lead industries association had grown into a political force.
- Because it is almost impossible to get rid
of (lead in any other way).
- Not acceptable because studies have found
that even infinitesimally low levels down to 1 or 2 micrograms per
deciliter can reduce a child’s IQ and impair her self control and ability
to organize thoughts.
- More black children might have been living
in slum housing. This idea should naturally pass through the mind of a
reader as he reads. The question is
here to make sure you think as you read.
- The government sponsored public health
campaigns characterized lead poisoning as a behavioral problem of the poor
they called “pica”.
- The lead industry lied to the Americans
for decades and the government did nothing to stop it.
- It was opposed by the lead industry,
realtors, landlords, insurance companies and even some pediatricians
- That they are a bureaucratic business
- The fact that Napoleon made public health
a priority
- Activist pressure and fear of insipient
unrest
- Because he agrees that the poor themselves
need to have a voice in shaping programs that fight against lead
poisoning. Careful: the agreement
only concerns lead poisoning so you need to limit the answer.
- Chisolm and Farley feeling that they had
no choice but to try to figure out how many corners they could cut.
- Working with communities to use research
findings more creatively
No comments:
Post a Comment