By: George Friedman
Published: April 11, 2012; Stratfor ; May
15,2012 finance.townhall.com/columnists/georgefriedman . Alternatively, Google the title along with the
writer’s name.
Level of Difficulty: *****
QUESTIONS
Read the first three paragraphs of the text.
1.
What
is it that holds these three paragraphs together as a meaningful and coherent
unit? Analyze to provide specific reasons.
Read “Iran as a Regional Power”
2.
Read
the account of the shah’s and Ahmedinejat’s policies. What conclusion can be
drawn from this information?
3.
The
writer reaches the following conclusion in the second paragraph in this
section: “Both acted within the traditions of Iranian strategic subtlety”. Use
your own words to state how he reaches this conclusion. Be as brief as
possible.
4.
What
does “this maneuvering” in the sentence “As a result of this maneuvering, Iran
achieved two goals.” Refer to?
5.
Iran
regarded getting the US out of Iraq as necessary to avoid ……………………………………………
6.
An
opportunity was created for Iran in the region due to the elimination of two
other threats as well. They were:
………………………………………………………………………………………………...............
Before moving on, provide a brief summary of
this section.
Read “Iran’s Opportunity”
7.
Iran’s
current strategy involves a fine balancing act which is basically …………………………………
8.
The
long standing fear Iran is trying to exploit is ………………………………………………………………….
9.
Read
the information concerning North Korea. What specific aspect of North Korean
policy did Iran adopt? Be very specific.
10.
What
is the advantage of the above policy for Iran?
11.
Read
the information concerning Israel. What conclusion can we draw concerning
Iranian policy from this information?
Before you move on, provide a brief summary of
this section.
Read “Syria’s importance to Iran”
12.
The
first paragraph in this section ends with the following sentence: “And this is
why the United States is currently obsessing over Syria”. Why exactly is the US
obsessing over Syria? To prevent
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
13.
What
are the three advantages to Iran of the above strategy? Be brief and to the
point.
14.
In
the conclusion of the text, the current Iranian strategy is summarized State
clearly what it is.
Last of all; provide a brief summary of this
section also.
KEY AND TEACHER’S NOTES
This activity is also based on a brilliant
George Friedman analysis of Iran and the country being a neighbour, should
interest our students; that and the fact that the essay is again beautifully
planned, concise and insightful. This essay lent itself to more challenging
comprehension questions and by default, to more challenging summary exercises.
I hope it is useful. As with every activity I post, check for related videos on
to get the ball rolling; on tedtalks for instance…
- The topic sentence: Though always weaker
than these larger empires, Iran survived for three reasons: geography,
resources and diplomacy. The
concluding statement: Whether ruled by shah or ayatollah, Iran’s strategy
remained the same: deter by geography, protect with defensive forces and engage
in complex diplomatic maneuvers. The first paragraph deals with geography
and diplomacy, the second with diplomacy.
- We see substantial continuity in Iran’s
strategy since WWI. The following sentence is support: Iran dreams of
achieving regional dominance by breaking free from its constraints the
threats posed by nearby powers. This second sentence is not really the
best answer. The reason should be explained to the students.
- Possible answer: Both the shah’s and
Ahmedinejat’s foreign policy centered on the US which it tried to
manipulate.
- A sophisticated disinformation campaign
helping many factions in Iraq resist Americans, paralyzing the country
after the Americans withdrew.
- War with the US.
- The Ottoman Empire and the USSR.
- Solidifying its regional influence while
not triggering US retaliation.
- The US concern with nuclear weapons
- Having a deliverable nuclear weapon
- It causes the US to simultaneously take
them more seriously and increase its caution while dealing with them.
- An attack by Israel, successful or
unsuccessful, would cost Iran little and create substantial opportunities.
OR: The Iranians want a program not a weapon but having the Israelis
attack the program would suit Iran’s interests quite nicely.
- An Iranian sphere of influence stretching
from western Afghanistan to Beirut.
- The Us would abandon ideas of destroying
Iran, it would legitimize the regime, Iran could force shifts in the
financial distribution of revenues from oil.
- To avoid any sudden moves; to create a
diversion through its nuclear program.
No comments:
Post a Comment