Thursday, February 7, 2019

WHAT THE MEAT PARADOX REVEALS ABOUT MORAL DECISION MAKING



By: Julia Shaw
Level of Difficulty: **
BEFORE YOU READ
·         Cognitive Disonance – Leon Festinger  https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/cognitive-dissonance/  Be sure to watch both videos.
QUESTIONS
1.       What conclusion can we draw from the example of factory farmed meat?
2.       Adding a price tag affects our decision making by…
3.       Christmas involves the communal eating of turkey as does thanksgiving. What do these and similar examples prove? The reason for this is the wish to…
4.       Eating meat can threaten our identities as moral people because…
5.       Watch: Festinger and Carlsmith Dissonance Study: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h27FuaUa7s  and now read the account of the experiment. What was the purpose of the experiment? Be precise. In order to do so, you will need to tweak the text.
6.       Which group experienced the most dissonance? We know this because they decided …
7.       Acc to Festinger, people’s reactions to dissonance stems from the fact that…
8.       The names for cuts of meat  are all example of our efforts to… There are two answers; find both.
9.       What does “this” refer to in the phrase “this was done in two different ways”?
10.   What knock-on effect does the way we deal with dissonance in the case of meat eating have? It becomes…
11.   Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU6pwiSTMso Sweatshops and the fact that big brands still have their products manufactured there are an example proving that…
12.   Our ethical inconsistencies become resistant to change because our behaviour becomes…
WRITING TASK
Read this last paragraph of the text:
It is time for a revolution in how we talk about human beings, animals and the planet, and acknowledge our own hypocrisies. Rather than doing mental gymnastics to justify unethical behaviour, we must consider actually changing it. Identifying and addressing even just a few of your guilt-ridden ethical inconsistencies is likely to make you a happier person, and the planet a better place.
Now write an essay in which you support the above ideas.

WHAT THE MEAT PARADOX REVEALS ABOUT MORAL DECISION MAKING; KEY AND TEACHERS’NOTES
This simple and straightforward text deals with the relatively complex issue of cognitive dissonance initially in the context of eating meat and later in terms of its wider implications. It will hopefully lead students to think about our hypocrisies as human beings and how we can become a more moral society.
1.       Money changes our relationship with morality / The very existence of money, along with complex business and distribution channels, acts as a buffer between ourselves and the origin of our products. This can make us behave in ways that are deeply unethical.
2.       We can’t see the acts first hand, so they feel like they are unrelated to us
3.       Meat-eating is tied to social customs /Protect our identities (from a moral conflict)
4.       Bringing harm to others is inconsistent with a view of oneself as a moral person
5.       What impact lying and saying the experiment was enjoyable, fun and interesting  and the compensation for it, would have on participants’ rating of the task
6.       The participants paid $1 / the experiment must have actually been enjoyable
7.       The existence of dissonance is psychologically uncomfortable
8.       Conceptually distancing ourselves from the real origin of our food; OR  to make meat-eating seem acceptable by dissociating it from the animal it came from
9.       Physically, verbally and conceptually distancing ourselves from the real origin of our food.
10.   Easier to be cruel
11.   Through the process of dissonance reduction, the apparent immorality of certain behaviours can seemingly disappear.” The first sentence of the paragraph would not be acceptable.
12.    Normalized




No comments:

Post a Comment