Level of Difficulty: **
WATCH, LISTEN AND CONSIDER
·
What is terrorism? Definition, types, history
and statistics
http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-terrorism-definition-history-types-statistics.htmlWhat is terrorism? Definition, types and examples http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-terrorism-definition-history-types-examples.html
QUESTIONS
1. In
the introduction to the
article, we are presented with a dilemma concerning terrorism. What is it?
2. What conclusion can we draw from the
examples stated in paragraph 3?
3. What are the two main
characteristics of terrorism?
4. Of the examples stated in paragraph
5, which one is real terrorism?
5. Can one always differentiate clearly
between terrorism and guerrilla warfare? What is the problem?
6. What would you call the following
examples: The IRA bombing of a pub near London (70’s); the bombing of a bus
containing, among others, soldiers returning from the front; Aum Shirinyo’s
nerve gas bombing of the Tokyo underground; IRA bombing of the British barracks
near Londonderry.
7. The case of the men who shot up a
white church congregation in South Africa is an example
of………………………………………………………………………………………………………..(Be very specific)
8. The Tamil Tiger bombing in Colombo
and Dier Yassin are given as examples to prove
that………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
9. Give one example of diplomacy by
terror.
10. State one example of governments
which are guilty of terrorism.
11. The cases of Hiroshima, Nagazaki and
the Allied bombing of Germany near the end of the war are given as examples
proving that……………………………………………………………………………..
12. The basic difference between the 19th
century anarchist and nihilist and the present day terrorist is that the former
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
13. The activities of The IRA, ETA and
The Shining Path may be contrasted with such events as the Tokyo metro nerve
gassing, the Oklahoma city bombing and the activities of Algerian terrorists.
The Three latter events are different in that ………………………………………………………..
14. Read paragraphs 18 through 20 and
find three similarities and one difference between a terrorist group and a government(
i.e. an army)
15. State two reasons why the British
withdrew from India, Cyprus and Kenya.
16. On reading paragraph 25, how would
you rate a government’s chances of success in dealing with terrorists? What do
you base your opinion on?
17. What do the Baeder- Meinhof mob and
Aum Shirinyo have in common?
WHAT IS TERRORISM / KEY
The text is a brilliant descriptive essay
endeavoring to describe what terrorism is and isn’t. I, unfortunately, have no
way of getting the soft copy to you so you are going to have to find it in the
economist archive. This you can do by paying a nominal fee or enlisting the
help of members of staff who are already members. Getting back to the task at
hand, you should start with a discussion during which certain criteria will
emerge. These criteria could be noted on the board for comparison with the
views expressed in the text and further discussion. The vocabulary should be
exploited while reading – something I like to do while reading through the
text. Due to the way it is written, this text will never be outdated. It can be
used with intermediate groups at the beginning of December which should give
you some idea of its level of difficulty. It is important that you discuss the
arguments in
the text as you read as not everyone will agree with all of them and it is
important that they learn to have civilized discussions and listen to each
other. A writing task is not recommended at this stage of the year as the topic
is too hard.
1.
Terrorism
is not the simple, sharp edged bad guy phenomenon we all love to condemn.
2.
What
act or person earns the label depends on who wants to apply it.
3.
Terrorism
is indeed about terror; not just violence but its use to spread terror. And the
violence is aimed specifically at civilians.
4.
Italy’s
Red Brigade blew up a train in Bologna station killing 84 people.
5.
There
are grey areas
6.
Terrorism,
grey area, terrorism, guerrilla warfare.
7.
A
terrorist act with a “good cause”.
8.
The
terrorists’ ultimate success or failure doesn’t alter the truth.
9.
Iran,
Libya, Carlos the Jackal, East Germany…
10.
Much
of Latin America
11.
Armies
of proud democracies can be guilty of terrorism too.
12.
Discriminate
assassination was the typical weapon of the 19th century anarchist
and nihilist.
13.
Random
terrorism
14.
Difference:
the group is almost impossible to smash; similarities: personal devotion to a
cause, both groups may include people who enjoy violence for its own sake; both
are pursuing a policy they hope will succeed.
15.
Weakness
and a world view that said colonial empires had had their day.
16.
Not
high; it could not usually zap the terrorists’ territory as it could that of a
hostile state.
17.
They
were nutters.